Reply #12: OK! You talked me into it. Here's his response... [View All]

[many a good man]

FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS VOTE REPUBLICAN

Its a terribly sad thing to see one's friend taken over by the dark forces. The consequences of cognitive dissonance can do serious damage to one's mental health. Should I help my colleague reach out a helping hand to her poor lost friend, or is it totally hopeless??

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


i love the liberal responses. they are always full of inaccurate anecdotes in an attempt to rewrite history.
im interested to know who the "unelected" commander-in-chief is that your friend refers to in the first sentence.
im glad to know that your friend is qualified and can predict the longevity of a persons life. please ask that person how long i have to live! also ask that person why osama didnt die, hes been sick for the last number of years. maybe we should have just waited around for him to die of his ailments like the clinton administration tried. its also comforting to know that youre friend feels that if saddam was left to die, and his sons took over the country, the regime change would be more positive for the region. i guess that person didnt read or watch the liberal news media outlets describe uday and qusay as ruthless and lawless. im sure the people of iraq and the region would have been better off with saddams death....when it happened.
your friend should realize that this country was not founded on socialist ideologies. since when is health insurance a fundamental right? tell that person to move to france or germany, im sure they will be much better off. ask them to see how alic baldwin is doing while there.
i cant really comment on what the administrations did during the 80's in the mid east but im glad that iran didnt win control over the region. im sure that the world is better off not having one dominant force in the mid east.
next, clintons "containment policy" was a joke. oil for food only netted this man billions of dollars for him and his family. he also gave 25 grand to the family of any palestinian that martyred him/herself in isreal. no threat to the region? sure! the united nations also recognized that this man had wmb....he did use them on his own people. but i guess according to you friend that never happened cause it supports the current administrations view. clinton had the same info but decided to do nothing, just like he did nothing during the ethnic cleansing in rwanda when almost 1 mill people got slaughtered. i guess the best example of clintons "containment policy" was "operation trojan horse" in texas. 51 days of containment in order to finally have eighty some odd people die of which the gov didnt tell anyone how many of those were undercover gov agents...hence the name operation trojan horse.
furthermore to say that "Al Gore would have kept the top priority and focus of our national security agencies on the Al Qaeda threat, instead of ignoring it completely" ridiculous! did this person forget about the cole or the countless embassy's or the first attack on the world trade center? didnt that all happen during the clinton/gore years? and to insinuate that the bush administration should have prevented, or could have, 9/11 is ridiculous. all i know is that in the time since the attack(9/11) we havent had another. bush has liberated two countrys and crippled the al-queda network. he also changed the perspective on the lybian leadership and put inspectors in iran and north korea.... all without firing a single shot. yes we lost many soldiers and this is a high price to pay. i regret that. but to sit and wait to see what would be next is no longer acceptable.
im so tired of listening to all this liberal rhetoric. please, now george is not perfect. but to ignore what actually happened is wrong. it really just tells me that your friend is very close minded to what really goes on in the world and is brainwashed by the liberal left.

still love you!
- (NAME WITHHELD)

:crazy: