You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: FAO definitions of 'arable' and 'permanent pasture' [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. FAO definitions of 'arable' and 'permanent pasture'
Edited on Wed Jul-28-04 01:04 PM by muriel_volestrangler
Arable Land:
land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted only once), temporary meadows for mowing or pasture, land under market and kitchen gardens and land temporarily fallow (less than five years). The abandoned land resulting from shifting cultivation is not included in this category. Data for "Arable land" are not meant to indicate the amount of land that is potentially cultivable.

Permanent Pasture:
land used permanently (five years or more) for herbaceous forage crops, either cultivated or growing wild (wild prairie or grazing land). The dividing line between this category and the category "Forests and woodland"; is rather indefinite, especially in the case of shrubs, savannah, etc., which may have been reported under either of these two categories.

http://www.fao.org/waicent/faostat/agricult/landuse-e.htm

So their 'permanent' is pretty permanent.

Terracing might be possible, but it takes a lot of work - and would the soil be fertile enough?

Again, are you sure those sunflower oil yields are per crop, not per year?

It's not that I don't want it to be feasible - it's that I don't think it is - not with the current oil use in the USA. If the oil use could be cut to say 20%, then it could be a good way of supplying the transport requirements. But the reduction in usage is vital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC