 |
Latest | Greatest | Lobby | Journals | Search | Options | Help | Login |
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Bleacher Creature
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-27-05 04:10 PM Original message |
| Check out the Moonie Times Front Page |
|
Advertisements [?]
(I'm referring to the Bolton story)
I understand that some papers skew one way or the other, but isn't this a little bit too obvious? How do they even argue that this is "objective" journalism? What ticks me off is that this paper has an absolutely minuscule circulation. However, people think it's more prominent than it is because its articles are referenced over and over again by right-wing hacks. And finally, what the hell was wrong with being against Bolton from the start?? He was wrong from the start, and the additional information only served to reinforce that fact!  |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC