Reply #1: Misleading Headline [View All]

[EagleEye]

Your headline is misleading. Josh specifically says Dean was not waffling. Second, Dean's statement makes perfect sense. The very least those in Congress could have required is for the President to explicitly state how Sadaam was a threat. They never even required that. Face facts, the Dems in Congress caved to the president out of political expedience. Gephardt lead the way. Perhaps that is the benefit to a presidential candidate of not being in congress. Perhaps that's why those in Congress hardly ever win the nomination. In any event, Dean was a consistant opponent of the War. He saw through the smoke and realized there was no fire. Why didn't the others?