You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: Yes, I admit that I shouldn't call him a liar [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Yes, I admit that I shouldn't call him a liar
Since I do not know for sure that what he says is a lie.

It is only the vast probability of it. And my own (Brooklyn-bred, like Randi) bullshit detector went whizzing to overdrive, primarily because of the way he phrased his answer. Here's what I think: this man may have lost one son in Iraq. I think that's plausible. It was Randi who put it in his head that he'd lost two when she asked him the question. He seemed willing to talk about one, but was cut off and then changed the topic. The BSD was whizzing at this point. Sounds like a half-lie to me.

There simply is no evidence that two siblings have been killed in Iraq. As for the tree in the forest, I very much doubt that local media wouldn't have heard from somebody on this. Think of all the people who would have known two brothers close enough in age to join after 9/11. All those neighbors, all those high school friends, all those girlfriends, and teachers ("Are you Jamie's brother?"), and yet not one called the local paper to say "Hey, both Carter brothers have been killed in Iraq!"). The same dynamic that makes this story a tear-jerker for so many people here would also make it an almost inevitable news story for anyone that knew these guys. OK. Say they were half brothers and lived in different states. Now imagine the people that knew the first surviving brother (certainly we wouldn't assume that they were killed in the same incident!, especially since K.C. said "The first one..." which would indicate different incidents), when he informed them that his half-brother, also serving, was killed ("Jamie's half-brother was killed in Iraq yesterday."). Then, the surviving brother is killed. Not one of these people - no spouse, no parent, no girlfriend, no friend of the parent, nobody, would even contact local media and say "Hey, Jamie's half-brother was also killed 6 months ago." Nobody. This despite the fact that almost every single American killed in Iraq has a local news story attached to them, woith an interview with their friends, siblings, and parents! In fact, I would ask anyone to find a US serviceperson killed in Iraq that does not have an interview with parents printed in a local paper. Even two would suffice!

That's simply implausible. Except for people who desperately want to believe it, and for whom the implausible is always possible, and the possible always probable, and the probable always an inch from certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC