You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #91: Actually in that case he was an accessory BEFORE the fact [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #58
91. Actually in that case he was an accessory BEFORE the fact
A Time to Kill is a very good example of when the attorney-client privilege would likely be broken by the court, since the attorney was told of the crime prior to its commission. The attorney could be charged as an AABTF and sanctioned by the Bar for not reporting that conversation to law enforcement, since he had an ethical obligation to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC