You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMPORTANT: The legal definition of "whistleblower" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 07:03 PM
Original message
IMPORTANT: The legal definition of "whistleblower"
Advertisements [?]
whis·tle·blow·er (`hwi-səl-'blō-ər)
n.

An employee who brings wrongdoing by an employer or other employees to the attention of a government or law enforcement agency and who is commonly vested by statute with rights and remedies for retaliation compare qui tam action whis·tle·blow·ing (-ing)

Disclaimer: IANAL

It's very important that illusions regarding whistle-blowers and their (so-called) 'remedies' by statute be dispelled. A person who reports wrongdoing to the press is not regarded as a whistleblower! A person who reports wrongdoing internally is not regarded as a whistleblower! In order to receive 'remedies,' a real whistleblower must prove retaliation. (Try proving you were black-balled!) There are no presumptive remedies. In reality, whistleblowers are left to twist in the wind.

The press exploits this failure of the law. Whomever 'leaked' Plame's identity exploited the press's self-absorbed and socially illicit claim of privilege. Legislators, as creatures of corruptions big and small, have no interest in providing real and substantive protections for whistleblowers.

If whistleblowers had real and substantive protections, then the entire specious argument in favor of shield laws would evaporate.

The real problem we have in our nation is that we reward corruption and punish whistleblowers. Too many powerful interests rely on intimidations and coercion -- they don't want protections for whistleblowers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC