You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: I disagree. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I disagree.
Judith Miller has been this administration's journalistic tool from the beginning, & that she's sitting in jail protecting the WH is a testament to that. She won't be answering any questions because "she's afraid - the government is too powerful." As a WH insider, she knows too much & is being asked by a WH outsider for information she's "at risk" to divulge. My belief is that the information Fitzgerald wants from Miller is much bigger than the Plame leak. She's not innocent, nor is she principled.

I'm supportive of laws that protect the rights of "investigative reporters". It's the right thing to do. The question is, when corrupt White House officials use "investigative reporters" for dangerous revenge against those who disagree with their questionable way of doing business, or to whitewash the White House's dirty business, who is going to look out for the People's right to know what's actually going on?

And, yes, it does make a difference when WH officials start resigning as a result of a scandal. In the Nixon WH, the sacrificial lambs were offered when the situation was already out of control.

Here, in Rove's case, he is the major artery of Bush's despicable WH & it's going to work to our advantage, imo. This administration is apparently not going to let him go without a fight, but the problem is, the longer this thing drags out, the more the public will know about just how sleazy this character is. It reflects on this president's judgement & it's going to shine a light on his integrity: He said he'd fire the leaker; the question is, does he "mean what he says" & "does he do what he says", as he so proudly claims.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC