You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: They didn't have to start a "bloody revolution" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. They didn't have to start a "bloody revolution"
They just had to tell Bush, "OK, you want to play that way, we'll convene on Roberts in January AFTER we dispose of the Bolton nomination."

Simple.

But I would have settled for one of them simply calling Bolton a "liar". But they won't do that 'cause someone might get mad at them.

As long as the Dems keep playing this way, Bush wins.

Not all the Vichy Dems are spineless. Some are willing collaborators like Lieberman and Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC