You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Hardly ... say more, please. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Hardly ... say more, please.
Here is where I am in relation to this ...

I fully realize that Bush will not nominate someone that I think should actually be on the court. They are going to be someone who would not be on even my longest list. However, it is he who gets to nominate. So I am left with looking at where the nominees sits on the continuum of suckiness. Do they suck just a little or do they suck so hard as to suck the very light, life, and love from the entire room when they enter?

So, Opus Dei. Are you saying that he is a member?

If he is, what does that mean specifically?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC