Reply #136: I think this part is significant to the reality of the "evidence" [View All]

[blm]

Winer, who is now a private attorney with a specialty in information security, said it’s conceivable that electronic balloting was hacked in Election 2004 but that – without a credible witness confessing – there is little hope to prove it.

“There are systems for one-time use that erase themselves afterwards,” Winer said. “You’d have to have a confession and anyone who would confess would look psychotic.”
>>>>>

THERE is the biggest problem about pursuing any case. There is NO EVIDENCE. It's erased at the time.

The only thing that CAN be done is to deal with the FUTURE races KNOWING this stuff in advance.

I find it interesting that Winer is involved with information security now. This bodes well for future work on the machines. Winer was Kerry's righthand man at uncovering IranContra and BCCI.

To me it all means they KNOW DAMN WELL, and are trying to be careful or else it can blow whatever they are working towards for fraud free elections.

Winer is being very careful here, but also conveys the certainty that the machines are rigged.