Reply #25: That's probably true... [View All]

[Isome]

Abortion has always been an option to women who have access to money and private physicians, and it continues to be.

Poor women shouldn't have the same choice though. They're poor for crying outside; they have no business having sex. They need to spend their time working, or looking for work, not shacking up with or indiscriminately shagging men. That's the way poor women behave, you know. But, if they do get pregnant, the state should come in and take that child away and give it to a couple who can provide a stable home life.

If necessary, the state should swoop down on all poor, pregnant women and take the babies, one-by-one as they're born, and then hand them out to hardworking, well-educated couples. The kind of couples wherein the woman waited just a tad too late to try to get pregnant and is experiencing trouble. Her need to be maternal (and his need to be paternal) is limited to healthy newborns though, so they can't be expected to lavish their parental affections on a child who needs a family but is older than five.

Poor women are baby-making machines; it's easier to just take those babies and give them to deserving couples. They can always make more.