Reply #16: well that's odd [View All]

[Djinn]

because in the mea culpa I read - written by the man himself - he said he accessed the kiddie porn twice, he had the "very rational" reason of doing research, I don't buy it, BTW I don't think looking at a couple of jpegs neccesarily makes him a peadophile but to claim he was trying to stop it so he had to pay for it...seriously?? what did he think he could do? if you know of a kid porn site you report it you don't get your credit card out.

Oh and not being charged and exonerated aren't the same thing - he was never "exonerated"

How many other kid born buyer would get away with the "I only bought it (therefore I was complicit in the rape of a child somewhere) because I was trying to stop it" line - it's got bells on