You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: "Hey Guys: Big Testes Might Be Indicator of Small Brain" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Hey Guys: Big Testes Might Be Indicator of Small Brain"
I liked that headline better :)

December 8, 2005 10:40AM

" Men are often accused of having a one-track mind. When filled with lust, it seems they simply cannot think of anything else.
Now scientists have found there really may be a direct relationship between the male brain and his private parts. They found evidence that males can create plenty of sperm or lots of brain cells, but not both.

As a result it seems, in bats at least, that large testicles go together with tiny brains. A study published Thursday looked at 334 different bat species to see if brain size was linked to reproductive organs.

Among many species of bats, females are highly promiscuous, and when the researchers looked at the reproductive organs of these species, they found the males have evolved enormous testicles...

This may be because their sperm has to compete with that of other males and they want the best possible chance of fathering offspring."

http://www.sci-tech-today.com/story.xhtml?story_id=40031

--------

This was published over a month ago. I guess the wires just got a hold of it.


I think it's pretty interesting - esp. if there were relevance to humans. The idea that men would have larger brains when the women are more monogamous. It kind of makes you wonder if there isn't something to the idea that men feel threatened by the idea of promiscuous women. Many things in society point to that - the implication of words - for one thing - slut, whore, bitch, etc.

Apparently the men's promiscuity is irrelevant - or they just didn't address that issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC