Reply #79: Liberalism / progressivism |= the kneejerk defense of violent felons [View All]

[TPaine7]

despite Your Sophistry's best efforts to convince us otherwise.

I keep wondering ...

If Drug Dealer A rips off Drug Dealer B, and DDB comes knocking at DDA's door, and DDA (entirely reasonably) fears for his life, is DDA entitled to shoot and kill DDB?

How about if DDA has a criminal record for drug trafficking and, oh, armed robbery already? How come s/he wouldn't be allowed to be in legal possession of a firearm? Obviously s/he is in need of one to defend his/her life, because there's DDB knocking on the door with a gun in his/her hand ...

I bet you do keep wondering why poor, innocent CONVICTED VIOLENT FELONS are denied the RKBA while those dangerous lunatics with perfect records are allowed the free(r) exercise of their rights. No doubt it boggles your mind.

Indeed, drug dealers and good folks with convictions for armed felonies are the only types of people whose freedom to keep and bear arms you've ever defended (with the possible exceptions of the criminally insane, state employees and those who guard financial wealth), aren't they?

There are some things the morally and logically challenged will never understand. Just accept it.