Reply #36: Any Demolition experts out there?? [View All]

[InaneAnanity]

I spent last night researching and here are my new feelings.

I feel that even though the Pentagon is very suspicious, and my personal opinion is that a passenger jet didn't cause the damage, the easiest piece of evidence to look at is building 7.

I've watched building 7 fall over and over, and every single time it looks like a controlled demolition. The damage doesn't look nearly bad enough for the building to fall on its own. Plus, Larry Silverstein said to pull it on PBS. I'm entirely convinced that by "pull it", he meant to demolish it manually.

Here is my question: would it have been possible for a team of demolition experts to rig building 7 with explosives in 8 hours?? At 9 AM the building was evacuated, and at 5 PM or so the building fell. So, would it have been possible for Larry Silverstein to order a demolition after the fact, not requiring him to have prior knowledge??

This is very important to me. I've accepted that building 7 was demolished manually. If it is impossible to rig a 47 story building, like building 7, with explosives in 8 hours, then that means someone had prior knowledge of the attacks, because the explosives had to be planted there prior to 9/11.

It is a fairly easy argument to make that building 7 was manually demolished. If it can also be argued that a manual demolition requires that explosives were in place prior to 9/11, then that proves prior knowledge and, thus, proves a conspiracy took place.

A conspiracy only needs to be proven in one instance to be present. IMO, this is the easiest instance to argue.