Reply #12: Belief and dibelief. It is a religion - without shame. [View All]

[medienanalyse]

I would be ashamed to start arguing like

"I don´t believe it." or
"I think ..., I mean ..."

Especially when I would have constantly ignored
- the lampposts cut in front of the Pentagon
- the steel beams inside the Pentagon

both extending about as wide as the wings of the Boeing. I would ask: "How the hell can the wall LOOK beibg stabile und not so much hurt ? And so I would get information about the Kevlar on the panels. The proof for bigger damage is anyway the crash half an hour later. If the holes were so small as they seem to be why did the wedge fall down?

And so on. many things to think about in a different way. Like when you see a car crash Pgoto and discuss "How the hell could the guy survive that?" Vou would not make it a religion but you look for answers and explanations.

You do not ignore evidence like the photos of the baggage. They are existrent and published. The bodies are not and it is okay not to publish those.

Another aspect is:
"I am simply noting that there's a lot of covering up. No videos of the 757,no pictures of the wreckage or the luggage. Why not?"

They destroyed any evidence they could get. Generally. Not only the videos of the plane. I published a list of evidence they should have and which they do not provide. This list is nearly endless.

But the lack of evidence here and there does not allow to speculate. Take the evidence you have and use it. It is enough to grill Bush and Rumsfeld and Cheney.

The endless discusssions about "I see something nobody else has seen" and "Why does something not work/fall/disintegrate like I expect it to do?", this discussion is boring and only fun for the warmongers.

They do lie anyway as they want. You can never cope with a liar to counter every single lie he produces. Take the obvious simple ones and get them there with all power you have. Do not play their game. Conspiracy nuts do. They are NOT AT ALL supportive.