Reply #39: Here's a great pic. [View All]

[Reverend X]

http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/defaulte.htm

Of course it is attached to a really crappy theory, but what the Hell. Here you can see the three points of penetration. Namely, engine, bulk, engine. The structural steel cage held, only breaking at the two points impacted with the solid mass of the engines and one point with the main mass of the plane. The site I linked is way too reliant on speculation and variable measurements. In one graphic it shows the plane's wingspan as greater than the width of the building and in another it shrinks to a cessna, but the pictures are well archived.
Oh yeah, and this entire thread is still not important to the overall situation. The official story and the Comm. Report both fail to account for basic physical laws. Physics and Thermal Dynamics. Gravity is a constant. It neither increases nor decreases depending on the current Administration. No theory is necessary to counter the 911 story. No logic either. Math disproves it.

They think you are too stupid to do the math. Are you gonna let them insult you like that?