Reply #12: There are no states that Kerry can win that Edwards can't! [View All]

[tryanhas]

The point of the matter is Edwards can win VOTERS AND STATES that John Kerry cannot, and anyone who has not realized that yet is beyond helping.

Sort of makes Kerry look like an idiot for his statement that "EDWARDS CAN'T EVEN BEAT BUSH IN HIS HOME STATE."

Of course we know that you can beat Bush in LITTLE OLD MASS. JOHN KERRY, because it's so liberal up there, but what can you do outside of your comfort zone?

Not much.

Kerry would lose some of the states that Gore won, and if he did, what's he going to do next?

You all always start with the assumption that Kerry IS AUTOMATICALLY ENTITLED TO WIN THE STATES THAT GORE WON, but my question for you is what if he doesn't???

States like NY and California are going to have a lot of those electronic voting machines, like NH did during their primary, and SKULL AND BONES MADE SURE THAT KERRY WON NH JUST LIKE YOU ALL BELIEVE REPUBLICANS WILL TRY TO DO FOR BUSH COME NOVEMBER.

This entire process is a joke. Just like you all believe the republicans will rig the election in November with the voting machines, they are already being rigged for Kerry's Skull and Bones behind right now.

That's why I don't think that Edwards has any chance in NY or California during the primaries, especially if it is close.

But in a general election, Edwards can win those states by wide enough margins to not be screwed by the machines, and he can also win IN STATES LIKE NORTH CAROLINA THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE PAPER BALLOTS instead of the hackable voting machines.

Just something to think about...