You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #60: Not so [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

hope42mro

(175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jan-25-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #50

60. Not so

Clark never said he would vote for the IWR. He said he would put his support behind Bush if Bush decided to go through the UN, which he didn't. Clark has stated many times that he would never have supported the war that eventually occurred, a unilateral war, a war started BEFORE all diplomatic options were exhausted. He was always against the Resolution because it would give Bush complete decision-making authority (which, by the way, is illegal according to the Constitution, but hey, we're Dems and we already know that).

Oh, and you still haven't answered my question about "Which candidate doesn't have pol-driven answers?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.