You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: You are absolutely correct. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You are absolutely correct.
The only reason the media whores were able to say Junior "won" the 2000 debates (Which anyone with a brain who watched them would have disagreed with anyway) is because they weren't debates to begin with.

Any of the 9 candidates - even the ones I don't like very much - would kick Junior's moronic ass in an honest debate. We need to insist on REAL debates in 2004. No easy passes for the moron in thief. If he's really up to the job, he should be able to handle it, right? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC