You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #1: And most Dem officials would NOT [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

seafey

(204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Nov-12-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message

1. And most Dem officials would NOT

address the occupation of Iraq in 2004. Or before that. They supported it. This fact CAUSED it to happen. If there had been resistance from more than us perceived "anti-war freaks", people might have listened and asked more questions. Kucinich was the only Democratic candidate that stood strong against these people. Dean was right in there nodding his head about WMDs in Iraq, so it really cracks me up that someone's going to try to tell me Dean was the "anti-war candidate".

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.