You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #94: Cliched? Nothing I have said is remotely cliched. Warner hasn't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. Cliched? Nothing I have said is remotely cliched. Warner hasn't
been around long enough to be a cliche. As far as presenting in depth positions, I don't have to this, you are sold on the guy, I consider this to be your job to relay in depth information. All I've seen are resume materials and fluff pieces. I offer a balance to this. If Warner is applying for the job of President,IMO, he needs to present more that just a litany of accomplishments as a one term VA Governor.Why does he want the job? In other words, there isn't enough to go on in regards to Warner. Maybe some like an unknown that can't be pegged, but I like to know what I'm getting in a President.

Since the theory of detectability is one consideration in regards to Warner, I can only offer that the theory of winning with a red state governor has been disproved just about as often as it has been pr oven correct. IMO, it all depends on the the candidate and the times.

I consider my criticism of Warner over his "this Democrat" statement to be valid. I don't care how others perceived it or may spin it, I took it as an arrogant,smack down against anyone willing to call out the President and his actions, as well as an insult to those who have been addressing both the issue of the President misleading us and a positive outcome for the Iraq war. And he had the nerve to make this statement even though he has never been in a position to have had to make such tough choices before the war. His statement also concerns me on a more serious level. If we do not investigate and confront the mistakes and possible lies now, this will leave open the possibility that a future President will take our unconcern and inaction to mean that he or she is free to behave in a similar manner or even take it a level or two further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC