You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Yes he can. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes he can.
It is amazing to me that people aren't more upset about this, but a significant number of people seem to think it's okay.

The magna charta established the writ of habeas corpus, and it was incorporated into our constitution twice. First, in the language that says the writ of habeas corpus shall not be abridged, and secondly in the language forbidding bills of attainder. Bills of attainder are legislative devices where a legislature orders a person arrested by name.

Neither of these ideas are solely about the misuse of power. They are primarily about NOT GRANTING, or denying these noxious powers to tyrants, governors, legislative bodies, etc.

The country gets mesmerized by the sight of two airplanes flying into two buildings, and suddenly it's okay to pass the USA Patriot Act, giving the president the power to arrest based solely on his own say-so.

Jose Padilla, a US citizen, was arrested and held as a "foreign combatant" for three years. This was based solely on an executive branch decision, and it was only at the end that the judicial branch got involved. The question is not whether Padilla was guilty or not, because who knows? The question is if it could happen to YOU.

And it could. It could happen to you based on something you write on the internet. You could be arrested, held without bail for the rest of your life. You could be shipped to a foreign country that permits torture. You could be waterboarded (a mock drowning) until you confessed to whatever 'sin' the administration wanted you to confess to. If you refused to confess, or if it was decided you were 'bad', you could simply disappear. And this power is not just theoretical, the administration is actually using it.

1,000+years of history tossed down the crapper because of 9-11, and we've returned to the days of Torquemada and the inquisition, the Salem witch trials or the Star Chamber in England.

We've restored the terrible absolute power of monarchy to the president and undone the American Revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC