Reply #28: "The OP is clear and precise in its charges"- though factually challenged? [View All]

[Free the Press]

1). Kindly identify which charges in the OP are "factually challenged."
2). Please demonstrate that charges in the OP are "factually challenged."
3). Is the comment, " - though factually challenged," intended to be a factual challenge to the clear and precise charges in the OP?

***

Will DLC'ers offer compelling facts and links relevant to this discussion in order to convince those who are interested to know whether the OP's charges are FACTUAL, or will they continue to redirect this thread and the OP with a hit-and-run orgy of rickety one-line, all-encompassing counter-charges?

***

The charges in the OP do not become true by default, because the DLC'ers fail to disprove them.

Charges are not convictions.

Unanswered charges are compelling, though, and do discredit the charged, unless the charged can demonstrate that the charges are wholly absurd.

DLC'ers who have responded to the OP may be in agreement with each other in believing that they have demonstrated the charges in the OP to be absurd, but it seems to me that they have, instead, failed to persuade non-DLC'ers of the "alleged" absurdity of the charges and instead remain collectively content with their disconnect from non-DLC'ers.

The charges remain unanswered by facts.

DLC'ers can set the record straight by demonstrating factual answers to these charges, but they relent and refuse to bridge the gap between themselves and others.

DLC'ers, thus, perpetuate an "either your with us or against us" adversarial relationship with non-DLC'ers, while claiming it is the other way around, IMO.