You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did the US government chose to depose Hussein? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:26 PM
Original message
Why did the US government chose to depose Hussein?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sat Dec-16-06 03:27 PM by lfairban
For some reason I have this compulsion to find out the reason or reasons why we got into the war in Iraq and why we are still stuck there. Not the justifications that were given to the public, but the real reasons. The more I think about it the less simple I believe it is.

1) Oil. Keeping gasoline prices low can help insure politicians get re-elected. Geo-political considerations compel the US to control the supply of a vast quantity of low sulfur crude oil.

2) Saddam Hussein's Scud missile attacks on Israel during the Persian Gulf war and his anti-Israel rhetoric.

3) Saudi Arabia's interest in preserving the balance of power in Iraq between the Sunni and Shiite factions. The most recent episode of "Washington Week" clarified this issue.

There is probably a lot more such as the enrichment of Halliburton or military contractors, but I have been contemplating the triangulation of these three aspects as the best explanation of the governments actions since I saw WWR last night.

I don't think there is much argument that the administration is closely aligned with both Israel and Saudi Arabia. Thus their strategy from the beginning was to remove Saddam Hussein (2), gain control of the oil (1), and install a pro-American government that would retain the balance of power (3). After this was accomplished, they planned to move on to the next country, Iran. With child like naivete, they believed that this could be accomplished in a few months.

To oversimplify, we got into this mess to pander to the Israelis, and now we can't leave because a Sunni massacre by the Shiites would upset the Saudis.

Does this make sense or am I way off base here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC