You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #4: It makes no sense at all that they were considering firing all 93 - [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

gristy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-13-07 11:40 PM
Response to Original message

4. It makes no sense at all that they were considering firing all 93 -

in 2004 or in 2006. They were all appointed by * in 2000, as I understand it. It just seems like nonsense that they ever considered firing them all. Why are they pushing this meme? What does it cover for them? I don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.