You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #158: So you've never heard of the "editorial we"? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #156
158. So you've never heard of the "editorial we"?
When you see the words, "we", "us", or "our" in an editorial, it means "I", "me, "my". I assume most DU'ers know this even if you do not.

Once again, there was no way in Hell Bush was going to appoint a pro-choice Justice. As someone else stated earlier, this was not a case of "if only the Democrats had fought harder, this would not have happened."

The blame lies with lefties who insisted that there was no difference between the two major party candidates in 2000. Thank you, Ralph Nader.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC