You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: Oh, that smacks of intellectual dishonesty [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #52
70. Oh, that smacks of intellectual dishonesty
We are talking about the campaign here. If you want to see what Clark's positions on various subjects, simply go to his website and read them. They are interesting and varied and just as legitimate as any of the positions put forth on any of the other candidates websites and press releases.

You are not talking to Clark here, or even anyone working on his campaign. You are talking to Clark supporters and discussing why he would seem a better bet as a winning candidate than the others would. That is what we're talking about here.

In my experience, voters don't give a crap about position papers or things like that. What they care about is what they see and hear of the man (or woman) running for office.

Nobody expects that Clark will not be attacked but at this point the discussion about attacks comes all but universally from folks who want to point out how this or that in Clark's record or this or that thing that he said will be used to attack him and destroy all chances of victory. This leads to Clark supporters zipping back with stuff about other candidates. Then the discussion falls into the "you guys can dish it out but you can't take it" and then we do the Nyah, nyah, nyah...my candidate can beat your candidate" and the cycle starts all over again.

Whoop de do.

Yes, Clark will get attacked on Shelton, and his statements about the Bush administration, and his hair, and all that stuff. We know that and we're ready for it. Its a fight, you see. That's why 99% of the things that come out of the Clark camp are aimed at the Invisible Airman, not the other democrats. Check the record. We know who the enemy is, we know how he plays the game. If given the chance, Clark will whip his ass and send him packing back to Crawford.
Maybe.

We still could lose it, even with Clark as a candidate and with all the various other campaign supporters signing on for the battle. We just happen to believe that in terms of character, training and personality, Clark happens to be the best candidate for this race at this time. We all know its a slim chance; we just believe its our only chance.

Why waste you time trying to change our minds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC