You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: "we've all realized that Senator Clinton is a long shot for the nomination"? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
36. "we've all realized that Senator Clinton is a long shot for the nomination"?
She's been in a near statistical dead heat with Obama for a while, now. If he's leading her, it's only slightly. She based her entire early campaign on the idea that she was the inevitable nominee, so get used to it. She hasn't dropped out yet, so I don't see why she should get a free pass for having essentially the same stance on marriage equality that Obama does.

As for your question, I can't really speak for "the Obama supporters". Obama wasn't my first choice, he wasn't my second choice. My first choice didn't run. My second choice dropped out early. So I can really only speak for myself, and my view as a straight, white, married male is, that there should be no compromise on the issue of full equality, including marriage equality, for our GLBT citizens. Period.

As for "addressing concerns", I don't know- as others have noted, most of the Concerns seem to pertain to the McClurkin episode. Frankly, the McClurkin thing pissed me off, too. Being an Atheist, so did Obama's comment that he didn't think any kids "felt discriminated against for having to say Under God" in the pledge.

But I thought Edwards's comments on gay marraige (John's, not Elizabeth's) were idiotic as well. Fact is, NONE of these people represent where I stand on 100% of the issues. I want a candidate who will end the idiotic drug war, legalize and tax marijuana, immediate institute a SPHC system, cut the military budget down to 1/3 of what it is now, and commit the human race to begin terraforming Mars before the end of this century. I realize I may not get everything I want in a politician. But I'm firmly committed to the idea of Marriage equality; I don't think equal rights are negotiable or 'baragainable'. I've been disappointed in almost all of our candidates on this, save Gavel and Kucinich.

I don't think it's the place of Obama supporters to address the concerns of some GLBT voters (obviously not all, since as the SF Chronicle noted, Obama's Deputy Campaign director is an openly gay man) ... that onus really falls on the candidate and his statments and actions.

Here's what the Obama website has to say regarding LGBT Americans:

http://pride.barackobama.com/page/content/lgbthome

It's interesting to note that Obama acknowledges LGBT Americans, issues, and supporters on his website. Hillary, as near as I can tell, does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC