You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #95: From your viewpoint [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #90
95. From your viewpoint
...and mine coincidentally.

Though there are many that disagree with you vehemently. There are cultures that deride any abuse or use of animals. Even hunting, or any kind of killing is wrong. Eating any animal is wrong. Eating any byproduct of an animal that you have kept in 'slavery' is wrong. Using their skins for leather, or bones for tools or even jewelry is wrong. There are other cultures that put no value in what an animal wants or feels or needs. They are property to be kept, sold, used, in any way or fashion that they decide. They hold no more position in the persons heart than a brick of their house, or a wheel on their wagon.

A question posed to them like this whether they'd prefer to be hunted as a moose, or fight as a pitbull you might be suprised at the answers you get. Some might say they'd prefer to be hunted because then they're free and could escape and live free. Others would choose a pitbull because they could fight and be strong and win their lives. Others would stare blankly at you and comment to their neighbors about the strange westerner and their odd questions.

My point is that the position has absolutely nothing to do with 'Animal Rights', and more with cultural beliefs and taboos. Our culture says hunting moose is ok, and fighting dogs is wrong or taboo. Others say both are wrong, others say both are right. If you were raised in one of these other cultures you'd believe, most likely, whatever it is your culture believed.

The point, applied to the inital subject, is that our overall culture says that hunting is fine, and dogfighting is bad, but other cultures don't. Sarah Palin's culture writes the taboos into law, and Michael Vick's culture (granted a subset of southern American black society, and not the overall african american culture as a whole) doesn't. Hence what Chris Rock said does have some merit. We live in a society where white protestants have put their taboos into law from homosexuality (there are still sodomy laws on the books) to drug use, and many other prohibitions. Meanwhile other subcultures that don't fit the mold of this primary culture must live on the outskirts of, or outright break, the law.

Whether you or I see the actual act as cruel is moot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC