You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Status Graphs for Obama’s Seventeen Swing States – Updated 11/1 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 08:52 AM
Original message
Status Graphs for Obama’s Seventeen Swing States – Updated 11/1
Advertisements [?]
(See last week’s Swing State Graphs)


The 17 states where the Obama campaign has focused much of their time and resources this year are:

Colorado (9)
Florida (27)
Georgia (15)
Indiana (11)
Iowa (7)
Michigan (17)
Missouri (11)
Montana (3)
Nevada (5)
New Hampshire (4)
New Mexico (5)
North Carolina (15)
North Dakota (3)
Ohio (20)
Pennsylvania (21)
Virginia (13)
Wisconsin (10)

If all these states were packaged together into one very large state, it would have 196 electoral votes. The graph below shows how Barack Obama is performing overall in this fictional megastate (he leads 50% to 44%).





The graphs below show how much Obama has led in each state over time (or trailed, if negative), and whether his lead falls into the margin of error of +/- 3 points (as shown in each graph’s purple rounded rectangle). The blue line shows the tracking of Obama’s lead in each state, and the red line is the majority line of zero. If Obama’s blue line falls below the red line, he is trailing McCain in that state. If Obama’s blue line rises above the red line, he is leading McCain in that state.


I chose +/- 3 points for the margin of error because anything above or below that is equivalent to a 97% probability of winning that state, according to Nate Silver’s correlation illustration below.



^ FIGURE 5d. This graph from FiveThirtyEight.com shows a correlation between a candidate’s lead in the popular vote and that candidate’s probability of winning the electoral vote and the election, if the election were held today.


Enjoy! :D





















































* * * * * * *


Here are three more, for good measure :D











.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC