You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #84: Eloriel and Kellis... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #52
84. Eloriel and Kellis...
Eloriel: Yes, exactly. Both instinct and logic tell us--and now we have an ever increasing mountain of evidence confirming it--that their Election 2004 Fraud Plan had four goals, the first two of which were: 1. Keep Bush competitive in the Electoral Vote (likely by tweaking close "red" states toward Bush), and 2. Manufacture and pad a Bush popular majority by grabbing %s here and there, all over, even in big Kerry states (and big Kerry counties, as the UC Berkeley statistical team's study showed in FLA).

It would have been unacceptable to the Fraudsters, politically, to have a repeat of 2000 (Bush wins the Electoral Vote but not the popular vote), and, since they had EASY access (means, opportunity) all over the country--Bush Inc. companies OWN the source code that runs all the central vote tabulators, and kept it secret, and insisted on no paper trail, as well as having all kinds of access to voting machines--the least detectable way to achieve a false majority would be to spread the vote-creation and vote stealing over a wide area. (There are so far some 15 to 20 states that had weird, anomalous numbers of one kind or another, all favoring Bush.)

This would of course include padding with Republican-registered voters who voted for Kerry, by changing their votes (one of the least detectable vote swindles).

The other two goals were, 3. To make it SEEM like it all came down to a relatively few "provisional" ballots in OH (or FLA), where Bush Inc. operatives were able to do massive vote suppression and were in control of the voting rules and the vote counting. 4. Public perception of a Bush Inc. win, which the TV networks provided by hiding Kerry's big numbers in the Exit Polls starting in the late afternoon on Election Day. (That's why we didn't have a Ukraine here--Kerry voters DIDN'T KNOW--whereas the Ukrainians rioted BECAUSE of the Exit Polls.)

Kellis: I'm with you! Throughout the whole campaign, I had a kind of rock bottom faith in the American people. I have an old-fashioned, down-home kind of perspective myself. And Bush Inc. was so obviously full of horse pucky, such liars and thieves, and Bush himself such a witless Howdy-Doodie (all hat, no cattle). I just couldn't believe all the good people I've met in my life all over the country wouldn't see right through it. And now the evidence is overwhelmingly confirming that belief. It makes my heart glad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC