You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: According to Cobb's website [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TripleD Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. According to Cobb's website
http://www.votecobb.org/

Cobb Calls for New Recount

Friday, December 31, 2004
Congress Urged to Reject Ohio Electoral Votes

On December 30th, two days after the conclusion of the flawed recount of Ohio's presidential vote, attorneys for Green Party presidential candidate David Cobb filed an amended complaint in federal court demanding that the recount of Ohio's presidential vote be done again, this time in conformance with state and federal law. more

"The people of Ohio deserve to have their votes counted fairly and accurately. The initial recount of Ohio's presidential vote was conducted inconsistently, haphazardly and in clear violation of even Mr. Blackwell's minimal standards. with the Ohio results still not final, it would be inappropriate for Congress to certify the presidential vote, especially while it is the subject of pending litigation in federal court," said Cobb.

"There's clearly a legitimate basis for a new recount. In a previous hearing, the judge indicated that if the recount was not conducted in accordance with uniform standards that we could petition the court for a new recount," said Cobb-LaMarche Media Director Blair Bobier.

//



It's my understanding that the inconsistancies included not doing a hand count in Fairfield County, even though the inital 3% hand count didn't match the machine count. Some counties allowed access to their pollbooks, others didn't.

An arguement cound be made that hand counting some counties while machine counting others led to inconsistant standards since undervotes and overvotes would be counted in a hand count and not in a machine count.

*disclaimer - I'm not a lawyer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC