You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #52: I heard the ethics rule changes [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-05 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #38
52. I heard the ethics rule changes
They proposed that if a majority didn't vote to indict the accusing party would have 45 days to either indict or drop it. That is very sneaky. What they have done is make it impossible to disclose to the public any investigations until they have investigated to the fullest extent and come up with the smoking gun. Furthermore they are going to have a real hard time investigating someone (and that includes Blackwell, Rove, Cheney, Bush, etc.) without access to the funds that would be made available to them if they did announce their intentions to indict. It is a sticky mess. the Thugs thought they were mucking up the issue enough that the public couldn't understand it's implications. From what I can tell the minute Conyers calls for an investigation the clock starts ticking for them to come up wit the smoking gun. That is why the thugs started harping on about conspiracy theories and bad mouthing everyone that had the nerve to speak up.

The fact that all these Senators and Reps were willing to stand up yesterday tells me they either think they have enough to find the smoking gun, HAVE the smoking gun, or just thought they'd rattle a few thugs into submission over something more important. The Thugs are scared and I think they ought to be.

I am trying to make this explanation as simple as possible, I'm sure I've missed a few nuances here and there but I think my interpretation is fairly accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC