You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #62: I'm not an intellectual property lawyer, but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #54
62. I'm not an intellectual property lawyer, but
I believe courts can review evidence in secret, and have the records sealed, so that trade secrets can remain secret yet be considered by the court. Not sure if any other folks can review the same info; but theoretically, if subject to some kind of confidentiality order, I don't see why not.

We don't want to see Diebold's software so we can STEAL it; we just want our experts to have a chance to see it to ascertain whether it served the American people in the way it was supposed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC