You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Just for the sake of accuracy... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just for the sake of accuracy...
... there's no hard evidence available that Howard F. Ahmanson, Jr., was one of the principal investors in AIS (I know--I looked long and hard for it at one time a few years ago).

Part of the problem stems from the fact that Howard's uncle and first cousin were appointed as trustees of the Ahmanson Foundation. A lot of people came to the erroneous conclusion that the Ahmanson Foundation is directly associated with Howard F., Jr. It's not. The Ahmanson Foundation was set up by the elder Ahmanson (the Foundation and Howard F., Jr. essentially split the proceeds of Ahmanson's will at his death) to promote the Los Angeles area (little known, but the elder Ahmanson was Jewish and not particularly devout--he was one of the movers and shakers in the so-called Westside development movement). In fact, the Ahmanson Foundation web site specifically states that it does not support religious causes.

Howard F., Jr. has his own foundation--the Fieldcrest Foundation, after his middle name--and there's just no indication that either Fieldcrest or Ahmanson, Jr., personally, ever invested in AIS.

The other Ahmansons did invest Ahmanson Foundation money in AIS, as an investment for the fund, and there are at least small suggestions here and there that a goodly percentage of the Foundation's shares were sold. Truth is, I don't think the Foundation trustees care much for Howard, Jr. In fact, I believe there was a lawsuit between them at one time.

Hate to burst a bubble, but after a lot of time in state and federal documents, there's just no way to be sure of this claim--even though it is generally accepted as fact due to a long period of repetition.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC