You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #80: That's a bit rude. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Wilms

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Apr-14-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #79

80. That's a bit rude.

And we have covered this ground over and over on other threads. You didn't like the answers then. Dragging it up again is your choice.

But you can see there is no ruling that HAVA requires lever replacement. And no one is arguing that NY is off the hook having taken money to replace levers. That's a separate compliance problem.

And so the case is not complete.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.