Reply #17: LOL - as you proselytize the merits of your beliefs you do not feel the [View All]

[papau]

need to proselytize the merits of your beliefs - it is just that secular humanist philosophy seems attacked by those of faith (why do you believe that those of faith attack as a concept something called secular humanist philosophy - or indeed why atheistic views are more under attack than any other variation of faith? By the way, I agree atheistic questions certainly fit well in a Religion & Theology group, as it is most certainly a belief system).

Does string theory, or QM, or Dark energy, have a place in the discussion of science?

Where does faith end and science begin?

I always thought all the science that one could do was to produce a reproducible experiment - and if you are on to something, use an explanation from that experiment to create another reproducible experiment that indicated you were on to something.

And then we discuss what the "something" really is.

:-)