You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #25: My thoughts exactly: The OP is defining what is supposed to be un-definable in such a way as to [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology

patrice

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Nov-10-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #19

25. My thoughts exactly: The OP is defining what is supposed to be un-definable in such a way as to

Edited on Mon Nov-10-08 02:18 PM by patrice

"proove" that it doesn't "exist".

It also appears to me that the real objection in the OP is semantic: "What do you call It?" "Natural Law?" or "God?"

An experiment:

That is god is an entity that created the universe, is free to intervene in it, but exists independently of it.

= Natural law is a set of phenomena that created the universe, inevitably intervenes in it, but is independently true without the universe . . . ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.