You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: The red thing was a poor joke. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Arts & Entertainment » Photography Group Donate to DU
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The red thing was a poor joke.
You can't have a winner every day, I guess.:dunce:

Anyhow. I am assuming that your first shot is either sand or snow. Look closely at the field here on the site. You'll notice blues greens, yellows, and reds that are distinct. This is a result of digital artifacting. What those distinct colors are is artifacts. What we're seeing is not a result of the original print or negative, but what the computer does with the information.

Digital artifacting occurs when an image is transferred into the digital realm. Normally, Photoshop will have the full computer download of the image, or "RAW" form, if it's scanned directly into it. This can be between 20 and 70 MEGS of computer memory for a single image. There is rarely artifacting in these, although it does occur with certain complex images.

JPEG is a compression algorithm. What it does is reduce the size of the memory necessary to display an image. It's in the same family as MP3, MPEG-2 (used on DVDs), DTS (movie sound), etc. A high or max quality JPEG compression should knock down the same PSD (Photoshop Display) image down to 1-3 MEGS (million bytes). The more an image is compressed, the more artifacting it gets. So, if an image gets reduced to 70-120 KILOS (Thousand bytes), then pixels (little boxes computers use to draw pictures) start to become prominent, and the photo's quality is degraded. Some photo hosting sites will automatically compress your images if they're too large a JPEG. Photobucket reduces everything to 1 MEG or less for me.

So, with that. Look at your original photo in photoshop, and see if you can see these same artifacts that we see here on the net. If so, try scanning it again using a larger capture, like 600 X 600 or 1200 X 1200 dpi (Dots Per Inch). If you only have a newer flatbed, then make it as large as the scanner will go.

Sorry to be so wordy. I don't know how to explain it easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Arts & Entertainment » Photography Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC