You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: In Washington State, Dr's are under no legal obligation to tell u anything [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
26. In Washington State, Dr's are under no legal obligation to tell u anything
From lab test results to "you're gonna die". Absolutely no legal obligation at all.

I know this because I'm in nursing school (will be an RN in June), and I asked my teacher (an RN) about this. It was in the context of what to do if a patient asks me, the nurse, if they're going to die, what their test results mean, etc. I asked if a doctor was obligated to tell a patient that they were going to die, or had abnormal lab results that indicated a problem, and she said ABSOLUTELY NOT. There's no obligation there whatsoever. It's not considered malpractice whatsoever. If I, the nurse, know this, I can approach the Dr and (supposedly) express my concerns. I could also let my nurse manager know that I felt the patient's care was being hampered by the Dr refusing to tell a patient that they were dying, that they had an incurable disease, etc, but that there was no legislation in place making it mandatory.

I asked if there was some kind of form (like a living will or medical directive) that you could have your Dr sign stating that you want to know any adverse test results, diagnoses, etc, and she said no to that too.

Fucked up, ain't it?

Btw--I don't agree that it shouldn't be legal. I thikn it's clearly malpractice if you withhold medical information from patients. Not all afflictions are physical in nature. There are very real economic and psychological impacts that go along with this information. A patient should have the option to NOT be treated, or tested, or cured, or whatever, but the Dr should not be able to make that decision for a patient by withholding that information from the patient.

I do not understand why people get into occupations that they have such moral qualms about. If an OB-GYN cannot handle the fact that s/he may, one day, be required to face unpleasantries in their career, they should perhaps choose a career that has a potential of unpleasantries.

I hate math. That's why I'm not an accountant. It would be perfectly unacceptable for me to go to school, become a CPA, then work for a company and refuse to add numbers, or purposefully make mistakes then shrug and say "Well, you know, I like being a CNA but I have a REAL problem with the math part...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC