You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: The national electoral infrastructure should have been on [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. The national electoral infrastructure should have been on
Edited on Wed May-17-06 10:56 AM by Raster
double-secrete probation after 2000. But no, we have 2002 and then 2004. And whom, collecting a dem paycheck, do you see screaming about the issues? A few like Conyers that both sides seem to work to marginalize. "...not understanding the full depth of it..."? Once again, only idiotus maximus would fail to grasp the full depth and implication(s) of a massively rotten electoral system. Either that or a willing participant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC