Reply #52: ah [View All]

[MsMagnificent]

Well I can sure understand that reasoning!
But it almost (from what I got from your post) sounded like with the group's blessing, the police could be told that even above veto powers, they could/should be able to forbid American citizens --anarchists or not-- the right to gather in protest.
Note I didn't say peaceful, but preemptiveness when there is no surety about the future --even IF the behavior is likely-- hopefully belongs to the ReNAMBLAcan's alone.

I've been leery since the recinding of Habeas Corpus, along with the myriad other fears, that this Preemptive pResident could easily start incarcerating US citizens because they MIGHT do something. With those jokers, it's very possible :scared:
(Don't know why that line break is in there -- is none on the composing page. Strange.)

Dang, now where are Nancy Reagan's psychics & astrologers when you really need them?? :eyes: