You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #133: I saw those reports, but there's no evidence that at the time [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #128
133. I saw those reports, but there's no evidence that at the time
the wounds didn't appear to be just flesh wounds/no big deal.

The pellet that migrated and affected the heart was not evident at that time.

So, your accusation of "lying or misrepresenting his condition" is not supported.

There's no point to me retrieving the initial reports to research your claim. I KNOW what the initial reports were. In and of themselves they do not provide evidence for your claim that his condition was lied about or misrepresented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC