Reply #8: Apparently, you did not read my post. [View All]

[MrSlayer]

I said those that are absolutely, 100%, no fucking doubt about it, guilty must face the hangman. In cases where there is legitimate doubt, life will suffice. Again, for every one of the mistakes there are a hundred absolutes. Why shouldn't the absolutely guilty pay for their crimes because someone else might be innocent of the same crime they are convicted of and sentenced for?

You and I are talking about two separate things. You are talking, legitimately, about the terrible railroading people, especially the poor and minorities, get in the court system. And I agree it's a ridiculous, heinous thing and I have all sympathy. However, there are the John Evander Couey, Joseph Smith, Richard Ramirez and John Wayne Gacys out there who are (were) absolutely guilty of their crimes and should simply be killed and left to rot in the dump where at least the rats can benefit from their worthless lives.

The way I have it set leaves very little room for error. If anyone is good enough to get you with video, DNA, multiple eyewitness accounts, you leading the cops to the body or any other form of absolute proof, while you are innocent, then they were going to get you no matter what. That's just really hard luck or you really pissed off the wrong people.