You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #104: Unmanned flight yes. Manned flight??? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #37
104. Unmanned flight yes. Manned flight???
I think the Space Shuttle overall has been of limited effectiveness when compared to what it accomplished. The ISS was, and still is, a joke. The amount of scientific knowledge generated from it compared the $s has been depressing at best. I think of how many unmanned probes could have been sent out for the money wasted on it.

As for the Hubble, the Space Shuttle was necessary to initially repair the Hubble, but I have to question if it would not have been better to build and shoot Hubble type telescopes on a regular basis versus funding manned missions to the Hubble with the upgrades etc. Someone would have to sit down and look at the costs. Manned space flight is very expensive.

The Hubble and its sister telescopes have advanced our knowledge in astronomy and astrophysics more than any other experimental tool since the invention of telescopes.

As far as if space flight makes sense at all (ie the scientific gains match the pay back to society), I would have to say yes. Experimental and theoretical physics go hand in hand, and physics is the midwife to engineering which is what improves our lifestyle. GPS is one recent example and communication satellites an earlier example. There are many more. One big potential future payback is the reduction of risk related to an asteroid impact (ie early detection and a space infrastructure able to address it).

Our understanding of geology and climate has advanced by the study of other examples in our solar system. If we ever discover extraterrestrial life, then the advances in biology, genetics, and biochemistry would be truly astounding.

Technological advantages that may come from space include giant solar collectors and the harvesting of minerals and metals.

Folks may not want to hear it, but what would a significant Chinese or Russian presence at the top of the gravity well mean for our future security? Surely an argument for manned flight.

Finally, what other science and other activities do you think we should defund? Ocean exploration? The various social and humanities studies?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC