You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Sad isn't it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sad isn't it.
They privatize the Corps, ostensibly to save money, because why would you pay for an engineering corps that isn't always needed to build stuff? Hey, when we need stuff built we can just contact it out and dump the contractors when we are done. Unfortunately, it's hard to wean contractors from the government teat. They have a vested interest in making sure the war goes on forever.

Meanwhile, the soldiers who used to learn how to build buildings and do electrical work and plumbing now don't get any of that free on-the-job training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC