You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: i recall it. and you misrepresent it. as you misrepresent me here, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. i recall it. and you misrepresent it. as you misrepresent me here,
preferring your own stereotypes to actually entering into a real conversation with anyone who differs from you.

because here's how i remember that conversation: the usual suspects cheering because uganda (US pawn, stomping ground for rabid US cia/fundie types, home of the death to gays legislation -- still in the works, btw) -- uganda had just legislated 10 years imprisonment for anyone practicing female circumcision.

the cheerleaders didn't want to hear that the main such practioners in uganda were small groups of isolated tribespeople in disputed border territories, barely integrated into the state of uganda at all, living essentially tribal lives -- analogous to indians in the us in the 19th century.

and that the main effect of throwing such practioners (females of the tribes, the mothers & aunts of the girls) into jail for 10 years would be the destruction of the family & the tribe -- in the same way the canadian practice of separating children from their parents in the 19th century -- a kind of genocide.

and that, since it is obvious the US-sponsored government of uganda wouldn't give a good goddamn what some backward tribespeople did unless there were larger geopolitical/economic concerns, we can assume there are -- one of which would be some kind of ethnic cleansing or control of the area those tribes occupy.

there was also the usual argument about whether fgm was practiced by non-muslims (it is) or whether most muslims practice it (they don't).

no, nobody wanted to hear any of that. all they wanted to do was scream "you're anti-woman! you support the mutilation of women! bad, bad, bad! those people are murderers!muslims lock up their women and slit their clitorises! blahblahblahblahblah!"

spare me from such retrograde "feminism".

ps: religious tolerance is supposedly a deep-seated value of modern western cultures. supposedly. unless it happens to be a religion the west is currently at war with as cover for its conquest of every last space on the globe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC