Reply #15: Then let me [View All]

[ProSense]

Here's the part that nailed it:

Professor HP is way too invested in President Obama to worry about what she says, I'm sorry. She's just too much of an unconditional supporter to take for anything more than that. What she wrote, for one thing, about President Clinton and DADT was intellectually dishonest and really unfair. I remember clearly how that policy was formed, back in the days of witch hunts and blackmail, when gays were not allowed to serve even if they stayed in the closet.

So if she uses that to say white liberals, who voted and volunteered in droves for Obama, have suddenly become or started acting like racists, then shame on her. It's too ridiculous a point to merit further discussion, except that it causes unnecessary rifts and turns people off.

...be more specific. Not only was the post title nonsense, but this is a complete misrepresentation of Perry's point, and seem heavily focused on defending Clinton.